EMERGENCY: Tell President Obama to stop the blasting on Coal River Mountain

Tell President Obama About Coal River Mountain – CALL THE WHITE HOUSE 1-202-456-1414 – A volunteer will take your call, and you can tell them to stop the blasting that has begun on Coal River Mountain this week! This is an emergency if you care about stopping irreparable damage to the mountain.
Coal River Mountain and the Heathrow Airport runway remind me how important it is to
keep our eye on the ball.
Coal River Mountain is the site of an absurdity. I learned about Coal River Mountain
from students at Virginia Tech last fall. They were concerned about Coal River Mountain, but at
that time most of them were working to support Barack Obama. They assumed Barack Obama
would not allow such outrages to continue.
The issue at Coal River Mountain is whether the top of the mountain will be blown up, so
that coal can be dredged out of it, or whether the mountain will be allowed to stand. It has been
shown that more energy can be obtained from a proposed wind farm, if Coal River Mountain
continues to stand. More jobs would be created. More tax revenue would flow, locally and to
the state, and the revenue flow would continue indefinitely. Clean water and the environment
would be preserved. But if planned mountaintop removal proceeds, the mountain loses its
potential to be a useful wind source (http://www.coalriverwind.org/ http://www.crmw.net/ ).
There are two major requirements for solving the global warming problem:
(1) rapid phase-out of coal emissions, and (2) a substantial, rising price on carbon emissions.
Election night euphoria is subsiding. Now we are in a tricky situation. The President
faces enormous tasks, so he must be given time. But directions, once set, are hard to change.
Clarity about what is needed is important. Young people (who deserve a large share of credit for
helping Obama get the nomination and win the election) had better ask what is happening.
The answer, or so it seems: not much. If that impression is right, there had better be a
hue and cry soon, or the opportunity for fundamental change may be missed.
Action 1. The important thing needed quickly is a moratorium on new coal. Coal River
Mountain is just one example of the idiocy that is proceeding. I am swamped by requests to
write letters. Can you believe that Nevada, with all its sunshine, wind and geothermal energy, is
going ahead with plans for new coal-fired power plants? So is South Dakota, South Carolina,
etc. I could harp about the greenwashed (or worse) politicians, but what is the point of that?
Now, given the election that has occurred, it should be possible to solve the problem. Solution is
possible, but will it happen? The national government has all the power that it needs to, in
effect, declare a moratorium on any new coal plants that do not capture and store the CO2.
Action 2. The other essential action is imposition of a rising carbon price. Is Barack
Obama going to explain the need for a substantial and rising carbon tax on coal, oil and gas in his
first Fireside Chat? Or will the matter be brushed aside, with a pretense that the world can be
moved in a fundamentally different direction by tweaking Kyoto-style approaches? In order to
move to the world beyond fossil fuels, there must be a strong economic incentive to do so, and
the business community must realize that we mean business. The tax does not have to start out
large, though it should be substantial. It has to be a tax that covers all fossil fuels. It should not
be a cap-and-trade that allows some carbon to escape, and makes Wall Street millionaires on the
backs of the public.
Reasons for concern:
1. The big action so far is the indication that the government will demand fuel efficient cars.
That is an important action. It will not prevent the world’s major oil pools from being used, but
efficiency helps buy time, so we can move toward carbon-free vehicle propulsion. Absent
improved efficiency, there would be pressure to squeeze oil out of coal, tar shale, etc. – disasters
that must be nipped in the bud. However, note that the vehicle efficiency action will only truly
succeed if Action 2 (carbon tax) occurs. Demand for highly fuel efficient vehicles will be
limited (not large enough to drive a thriving economy) unless fuel price makes them essential.
People will need money in hand to buy them – one of the reasons for 100% dividend (another:
the public will not accept a large enough tax if Washington and lobbyists are going to decide
where the money goes).
2. Jesse Ausubel makes a case that government policies don’t matter much – the energy-fossil
fuel situation determines things. Let’s look at data for fossil fuel emissions and the economy:
Data sources: (left) Marland, G., T.A. Boden, and R.J. Andres. 2008. Global, Regional, and National Fossil Fuel CO2 Emissions. In Trends: A
Compendium of Data on Global Change. Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, U.S. Department of
Energy, Oak Ridge, Tenn., U.S.A. (http://cdiac.ornl.gov/trends/emis/tre_usa.html) (right) U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic
Analysis, National Economic Accounts (http://www.bea.gov/national/index.htm#gdp)
The numbers on these graphs are misleading. Emissions and economic growth in the first year
of a President’s term probably should be credited to (blamed on) the prior President. In that case
the numbers become:
Annual Growth Rates for: CO2 emissions Real GDP
1981 􀃆 1989 (Reagan) 1.2% 3.5%
1989 􀃆 1993 (Bush, G.H.W.) 1.3% 1.9%
1993 􀃆 2001 (Clinton) 1.1% 3.5%
2001 􀃆 2007 (Bush, G.W.) 0.7% (first 6 years) 2.6% (first 6 years)
The CO2 emissions support Ausubel’s thesis, but the period covered was all business-as-usual.
There is such a thing as free will. With coal phase-out and a rising price on carbon emissions,
the curve can be changed fundamentally, and move downward fast. But it will not happen as a
consequence of “goals” and weak cap-and-trade measures — and a temporary downturn of
emissions due to economic slowdown should not be misinterpreted as fundamental change.
Conclusion
We are only weeks into the Obama administration. But people are getting restive. I have
been asked to speak at or support several different actions, in different parts of the country, by
young people and not so young. I don’t know what to say. I feel that more time must be given.
But these people are right – the directions that are taken now are important.
Someone needs to tell President Obama: Coal River Mountain is a symbol of the promise
and the hope and the possibilities for a brighter future. As he begins to address the nation’s
energy, climate and economic challenges, he needs to remember these people, among his core
original supporters. They are counting on him to change direction – a real change.
Post Script: Apology to UK Environmentalists
I have relearned a basic lesson re interviews – which will have to be fewer and more
guarded. I recall giving only one interview to UK media this year, but perhaps it was two. One
resulting story was that I said the climate problem must be solved in four years – of course, what
I meant to say was that we needed to start moving in a fundamentally different direction during
President Obama’s first term. CO2 in the air will continue to increase in those four years – we
are not going to take the vehicles off the roads or shut down commerce.
I must have said something dumber in response to a question about air travel. Special
apologies to people working in opposition to expansion of Heathrow Airport – I had no intention
of damaging their case. All I intended to say was that aviation fuel is not a killer for the climate
problem – at worst case we can use carbon-neutral biofuels (not current biofuels – there are ways
to do biofuels right, for the fuel volume needed for global air traffic – ground transport will need
a different energy source). When asked about the proposed added runway at Heathrow, I
apparently said, in effect, that coal is the (climate) problem, not an added runway – in any case,
what was reported angered a huge number of people, as indicated by my full e-mail inbox. I
should have deferred questions on Heathrow to local experts – I am sure there are many good
environmental reasons to oppose airport expansion. I am very sorry that I was not more guarded.
You can be sure that in the future I will be more careful to avoid making comments that can be
used against good causes.

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Coal Country Movie News. Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s